Engaging People Affected by Devolution From the inception of the Smith Commission process, and throughout,At present, these clauses do not reflect the 'spirit and substance' of the Smith Commission.,26 does not reflect Smith or fully implement the Commission’s recommendations.,Again, the Bill fails to reflect the terms of the Smith Commission.,This does not reflect the intention behind the Smith Commission proposals.

As SCVO has said in its interim submission to Lord Smith’s Commission, the full involvement of citizens,References [i] See http://www.scvo.scot/long-form-posts/scvos-vision-of-a-scotland-for-all/ [ii] See,http://www.scvo.scot/long-form-posts/smith-commission-scvo-interim-response/ [iii] See https://www.constitution.ie,/ [iv] See http://www.scvo.scot/long-form-posts/scvo-response-standards-committee-inquiry-procedures-for-considering-legislation,/ [v] See http://www.scvo.scot/long-form-posts/scvos-vision-of-a-scotland-for-all/

For the purpose of the Smith Commission’s work we think that a commitment to a bi-partisan approach to,We expect the Smith Commission to rule out this option.,[v] The devolution of the Crown Estate to the Scottish Parliament was advocated by SCVO in its 2011 response,SCVO hopes that this initial submission gives the Smith Commission an insight into some of the issues,We also hope that these initial thoughts will form part of the Commission’s discussions with the political