Share your own experiences with generative AI
If you've been trying out generative AI tools, you can share your experience anonymously. This will help us develop and tailor more resources and support. We can also put you in touch with other organisations if you wish.
Share your experience
Generative AI tools allow you to create new content (text or images) from short or complex prompts. This can be helpful as you are drafting new content, as long as you check the output carefully. Here are some examples:
It’s worth emphasising that you’ll still need to apply your expertise and experience to ensure that you supply the right prompts and context at the beginning of the process. And you’ll need to apply your critical judgement to check the result, especially if you are developing informational content to help people make decisions.
The ICO has guidance on how you can identify and manage risks when you're considering making use of AI tools or platforms.
A current weakness of generative AI is that it is, quite literally, making things up. Based on a very refined language model and a fair bit of computing power, generative AI essentially guesses what would be the most plausible response and outputs the result. Because language patterns are predictable, this next best guess approach is surpisingly effective. However, generative AI tools are not usually able to make real-world fact checks at the moment. Some companies such as Google and Microsoft are linking generative AI tools to recent web content in an effort to improve their accuracy.
The next step will be retrieval-based AI tools. These will work in a similar way to generative AI, but they will match and check results against a pre-defined data set. So, for example, you could instruct a retrieval-based AI tool to check against a library of published guidance when producing answers to queries. This should radically improve the reliability of these tools for people seeking factual information.